Cambio de uso del suelo en paisajes agrícolas-forestales: análisis espacial en cinco comunidades Kichwas de la Región Amazónica Ecuatoriana

Segundo Bolier Torres Navarrete; Lucy Andrade; Alexandra Torres Navarrete; Cristian Vasco; Marco Robles

doi:10.59410/RACYT-v07n02ep05-0094

Autores/as

Bolier Torres Universidad Estatal Amazónica
Lucy Andrade Universidad Estatal Amazónica
Alexandra Torres Universidad Estatal Amazónica
Cristian Vasco Central University of Ecuador
Marco Robles

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59410/RACYT-v07n02ep05-0094

Palabras clave:

Tasas de deforestación, comunidades indígenas

Resumen

La presente investigación se realizó en la zona sur de la provincia de Napo, cantón Tena, a las riberas del río Napo en las parroquias: Puerto Misahualli, Chonta Punta y Ahuano, en un área de importancia global por formar parte de las zonas de transición de las reservas de biosfera Sumaco y Yasuní. Se seleccionaron cinco comunidades mediante muestreo intencional con la finalidad de cumplir con los siguientes parámetros: ubicación de la comunidad respecto al camino transitado (cerca o lejos), grupo étnico (kichwas), tamaño de la comunidad (grande mayor de 40 hogares y pequeña menor a 40 hogares) y disponibilidad de proveer información. La metodología también usó cinco categorías de uso del suelo: bosque que se refiere a bosque nativo y secundario, sistemas agroforestales (SAF) que incluyen las áreas de realces, y la categoría de pastos y cultivos de ciclo corto. Los resultados muestran tasas de deforestación promedio anual de entre 1,17% a 3,67% a nivel comunitario, cifras relativamente altas considerando la tasa de deforestación anual reportadas por la autoridad forestal nacional en Ecuador. Los resultados también muestran que fincas mayores a 2 hectáreas poseen áreas de bosques entre el 20% y el 84% dependiendo del tamaño. El documento finaliza con algunas recomendaciones para un mejor manejo forestal a nivel comunitario.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Arnold, M., Powell, B., Shanley, P., Sunderland, T.C.H. 2011. Editorial: forests, biodiversity and food security. Int. For. Rev. 13 (3, SI), 259–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1505/146554811798293962

Gray, C.L.; Bilsborrow, R.E.; Bremner, J.L.; Lu, F. 2008. Indigenous land use in the Ecuadorian Amazon: A cross-cultural and multilevel analysis. Hum. Ecol. 36, 97–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-007-9141-6

Bravo, C., Benítez, D., Vargas-Burgos, J. C., Alemán, R., Torres, B., & Marín, H. 2015. Socio-Environmental Characterization of Agricultural Production Units in the Ecuadorian Amazon Region, Subjects Pastaza and Napo. Revista Amazónica Ciencia y Tecnología. 4 (1): 3-31. https://doi.org/10.59410/RACYT-v04n01ep01-0045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59410/RACYT-v04n01ep01-0045

Boserup, E. 1965. The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change underpopulation pressure. New Brunswick, USA:

Daniel Coq-Huelva, Bolier Torres, Carlos Bueno. 2017. Indigenous worldviews and Western conventions: Sumak Kausay and cocoa production in Ecuadorian Amazonia. Agriculture and Human Values pp 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9812-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9812-x

Davidson, E. A., A. C. de Araujo, P. Artaxo, J. K. Balch, I. F. Brown, C. B. MM, M. T. Coe, R. S. DeFries, M. Keller, M. Longo, J. W. Munger, W. Schroeder, B. S. Soares-Filho, C. M. Souza, Jr. & S. C. Wofsy (2012). The Amazon basin in transition. Nature, 481, 321-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10717

Hickey, G.M., Poiliot, M., Smith-Hall, C., Wunder, S., Nielsen, M.R., 2016. Quantifying the economic contribution of wild food harvests to rural livelihoods: a global comparative analysis. Food Policy 62, 122–132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.06.001

Ickowitz, A., Powell, B., Salim, M.A., Sunderland, T.C.H., 2014. Dietary quality and tree cover in Africa. Glob. Environ. Chang. 24, 287–294.

Kaimowitz, D., & Angelsen, A. 1998. Economic models of tropical deforestation: A Review. Center for International Forestry Research CIFOR. 139 pp.

Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H., Agbola, S., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., . . . Xu, J. (2001). The causes of land-use and cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11, 261-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3

Le Queré, C.; Al, E. Global carbon budget 2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2018, 10, 405–448.

López, S. & Sierra, R. 2010. Agricultural Change in the Pastaza River Basin: A Spatially Explicit Model of Native Amazonian Cultivation.” Applied Geography 30, no. 3: 355–369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.004

Lu, F., Gray, C., Bilsborrow, R.E., Mena, C.F., Erlien, C.M., Bremner, J., Walsh, S.J., 2010. Contrasting colonist and indigenous impacts on Amazonian Forest. Conserv. Biol. 24 (3), 881–885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01463.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01463.x

Mejía E., Pacheco P., Muzo A., Torres B. 2015. Small-holders and timber extraction in the Ecuadorian Amazon: amidst market opportunities and regulatory constraints. International Forestry Review. 17 (S1):38±50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815814668954

Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador. 2012. Estimación de la Tasa de Deforestación del Ecuador Continental, Quito-Ecuador. 38 pp

Pingali, P., 2015. Agricultural policy and nutrition outcomes–getting beyond the preoccupation with staple grains. Food Sec. 7 (3), 583–591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0461-x

Powell, B., Thilsted, S., Ickowitz, A., Termote, C., Sunderland, T., Herforth, A., 2015. Improving diets with wild and cultivated biodiversity from across the landscape. Food Sec. 7 (3), 535–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0466-5

Powell, B., Salim, M.A., Sunderland, T.C.H., 2014. Dietary quality and tree cover in Africa. Glob. Transaction Publishers. Environ. Chang. 24, 287–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.001

Powell, B., Iockowitz, A., Mcmullin, S., Jamnadass, R., Padoch, C., Pinedo-Vasque, M., Sunderland, T., 2013a. The role of forests, trees and wild biodiversity for nutritionsensitive food systems and landscapes. In: Expert Background Paper for the International Conference on Nutrition (ICN 2). FAO, Rome

Rasmussen, Laura., Watkins Cristy, Agrawal Arun. 2017. Forest contribution to livelihoods in changing agriculture-forest landscapes. Forest Policy and Economics. 84 (2017), 1–8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.010

Rudel, T. K., D. Bates & R. Machinguiashi 2002. Ecologically Noble Amerindians? Cattle ranching and cash cropping among Shuar and Colonist in Ecuador. Latin American Research Review. 37(1): 144-159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100019385

Schwartzman, S., Moreira, A., & Nepstad, D. 2000. Rethinking Tropical Forest Conservation: Perils in Parks. Conservation Biology, 14(5), 1351–1357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99329.x

Shackleton, S.E., Shackleton, C.M., Netshiluvhi, T.R., Geach, B.S., Ballance, A., Fairbanks, D.H.K. 2002. Use patterns and value of savanna resources in three rural villages in South Africa. Econ. Bot. 56 (2), 130–146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2002)056[0130:UPAVOS]2.0.CO;2

Sirén, A. H., J. C. Cardenas, and J. D. Machoa. 2006. The relation between income and hunting in tropical forests: an economic experiment in the field. Ecology and Society 11(1): 44. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art44/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01640-110144

Sirén, A., P. Hambäck, and J. Machoa. 2004. Including spatial heterogeneity and animal dispersal when evaluating hunting: a model analysis and an empirical assessment in an Amazonian community. Conservation Biology 18(5):1315-1329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00024.x

Thorner, D., B. Kerblay and R.E.F. Smith. 1986. A.V. Chayanov on the Theory of Peasant Economy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press

Torres, B.; Günter, S.; Acevedo-cabra, R.; Knoke, T. 2018a. Livelihood strategies, ethnicity and rural income: The case of migrant settlers and indigenous populations in the Ecuadorian Amazon. For. Policy Econ., 86, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.011

Torres, B., Vasco, C. Günter, S., and Knoke, T. 2018. Determinants of agricultural diversification in a hotspots area: evidence from colonist and indigenous communities in the Sumaco Biosphere Reserve, Ecuadorian Amazon. In: Sustainability Vol. 10(5), 1432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051432

Torres Bolier, Oswaldo Jadán Maza, Patricia Aguirre, Leonith Hinojosa and Sven Günter. 2015. The Contribution of Traditional Agroforestry to Climate Change Adaptation in the Ecuadorian Amazon: The Chakra System. In: Leal Filho Walter (Ed.), Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 1973-1994 pp DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38670-1_102

Torres, B.; Bilsborrow, R.; Barbieri, A.; Torres, A. 2014. Cambios en las estrategias de ingresos económicos a nivel de hogares rurales en el norte de la Amazonía Ecuatoriana. Rev. Amazón. Cienc. Tecnol., 3, 221–257. https://doi.org/10.59410/RACYT-v03n03ep03-0043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59410/RACYT-v03n03ep03-0043

Turner, B. L., and Ali A. M. 1996. Induced Intensification: Agricultural Change in Bangladesh with Implications for Malthus andBoserup. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93, no. 25: 14984–14991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.25.14984

Vance, C., Geoghegan, J. 2004. Modeling the determinants of semi-subsistent and commercial land uses in an agricultural frontier of southern mexico: A switching regression approach. International regional science review. 27, 3: 326–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017604266029

Vasco, C., Bilsborrow, R., Torres B., and Griess, V. 2018. Agricultural land use among mestizo colonist and indigenous populations: Contrasting patterns in the Amazon. PloS ONE 13(7): e0199518. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199518

Vasco, C.; Tamayo, G.; Griess, V. 2017a. The drivers of market integration among indigenous peoples: Evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazon. Soc. Nat. Resour. 30, 1212–1228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1331487

Vasco, C., Torres, B., Pacheco, P., Griess, V. 2017b. The socioeconomic determinants of legal and ilegal smallholder logging: Evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazon. Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 78(2017): 133-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.015

Vasco, C., Bilsborrow, R., Torres, B. 2015. Income diversification of migrant colonists vs. Indigenous populations: Contrasting strategies in the Amazon. J. Rural Stud., 42, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.003

Vera‑Velez, R., Grijalva J. Cota‑Sanchez, H. 2019. Cocoa agroforestry and tree diversity in relation to past land use in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon. New Forests. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09707-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09707-y

Vera, V.R.R., Cota-Sánchez, J.H.; Grijalva Olmedo, J.E. 2017. Biodiversity, dynamics and impact of chakras on the Ecuadorian Amazon. J. Plant Ecol. 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtx060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtx060

von Thünen, J. H. (1966). The Isolate State. Oxford: Perganon

Wunder, S., Noack F., Angelsen A. 2018. Climate, crops and forests: a pan-tropical analysis of house hold income generation. Environment and Development Economics, 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X18000116