Proteína de harinas de maíz, cebada, quinua, trigo nacional y papa: características y funcionalidad como sustitutos de la proteína de harina de trigo importado en la producción de pan y fideos

Liliana Cerda-Mejía; Victor Rodrigo Cerda Mejia; Araceli Pilamala Rosales; Carlos Moreno Miranda; Amaury ¨Pérez Martínez

doi:10.59410/RACYT-v06n03ep02-0082

Authors

Liliana Cerda-Mejía Universidad Técnica de Ambato
Víctor Rodrigo Cerda Mejía Universidad Estatal Amazónica https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2395-9711
Araceli Pilamala Rosales Universidad Técnica de Ambato
Carlos Moreno Miranda Universidad Técnica de Ambato
Amaury Pérez Martínez Universidad Estatal Amazónica https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3978-7982

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59410/RACYT-v06n03ep02-0082

Keywords:

Proteins, Characteristics, Functionality, Substitution

Abstract

Wheat is one of the most important cereals in bread making since the functionality that their proteins possess makes it unique. Physicochemical analyzes were performed on all samples of ﬂours selected. In order to obtain a ﬂour that suits the processes of making bread and noodles. Five ﬂours from cereals and one tuber (wheat, maize, barley, quinoa and potato) were selected. The experimental design was the design of a single completely randomized factor. Thee parameters that were used to determine the characteristics and the functionality of the proteins of these ﬂours were the capacity of solvent retention and the determination of disulﬁde and sulfhydryl groups since these are directly bound to the quaternary and tertiary structure of the proteins. It was established as better treatments to the barley ﬂour and the national wheat. The objective of this research was to determine which type of ﬂour from diﬀerent cereals (maize, barley, quinoa, domestic wheat) and tuber (potato) could substitute wheat ﬂour according to the characteristics and functionality of the proteins in the elaboration of bread and noodles

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

AOAC Oﬃcial Methods of Analysis, 18th Edition (2005), métodos 925.40, 981.10, 942.05, 978.10

Andrews, D.C., Caldwell, R.A. & Quail, K.J., 1995. Sulfhydryl Analysis. I. Determination of Free Sulfhydryls in Wheat Flour Doughs. Cereal Chemistry, 72(3), pp.326–329. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7501/4546803a185836b0768b94ﬀb7b77e13bda6.pdf [Accessed March 26, 2018].

Badui Dergal, S., Bourges, H. & Anzaldúa Morales, A., 1993. Química de los alimentos, Addison Wesley Longman

Cerda-Mejía, L., 2010. Estudio de las propiedades funcionales de las proteínas de la harina de maíz (Zea mays), cebada (Hordeum vulgare), quinua (Chenopodium quinoa), papa (Solanum tuberosum) y trigo (Triticum aestivum) nacional e importado para orientar su uso en pan y pastas

Cerda-Mejía, L., Cerda Mejía, V.R. & Sandoval Chasi, G.A., 2017. Study of the functional properties of the corn ﬂour proteins (Zea mays), barley (Hordeum vulgare), quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa), potato (Solanum tuberosum);, and wheat (Triticum aestivum) national and imported intended for use in baking and noodles. In Proceedings of MOL2NET 2016, International Conference on Multidisciplinary Sciences, 2nd edition. Basel, Switzerland: MDPI, p. 3896. Available at: http://sciforum.net/conference/mol2net-02/paper/3896 [Accessed July 11, 2017]

Cherry, J., 1998. Protein Functionality in Foods

Flores, R.V., 2014. El gluten del trigo y su rol en la industria de la paniﬁcación., 32, pp.1025–9929

Goesaert, H. et al., 2005. Wheat ﬂour constituents: How they impact bread quality, and how to impact their functionality. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 16(1–3), pp.12–30. Available at: http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?eid=2s2.0-22244442208&origin=inward&txGid=QX6hCSRG-WIk3CQxSYSEUVA:8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2004.02.011

INEN-ISO 21415-1:2013, 2013. Norma Técnica Ecuatoriana NTE INEN-ISO 21415-1:2013, Available at: http://www.normalizacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2014/NORMAS_2014/DRO/nte_inen_iso_21415_1extracto.pdf [Accessed July 13, 2017].

INEN-ISO 5529:2013, 2013. Norma Técnica Ecuatoriana NTE INEN-ISO 5529:2013, Available at: http://www.normalizacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2014/NORMAS_2014/KCA/12092014/nte_inen_iso_5529extracto.pdf [Accessed July 13, 2017]

Kinsella, J.E., Fox, P.F. & Rockland, L.B., 1986. Water sorption by proteins: Milk and whey proteins. C R C Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 24(2), pp.91–139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398609527434

Kobrehel, K., Reymond, C. & Alary, R., 1988. Low Molecular Weight Durum Wheat Glutenin Fractions Rich in Sulfhydryl Plus Disulﬁde Groups. American Association of Cereal Chemists, 65(1), pp.65–69

Kohli, M.M., Cubilla, L.E. & Cabrera, G., 2013. Cuarto Seminrio Nacional del Trigo. “Del grano al pan.” In Asunción -Paraguay. Available at: http://capeco.org.py/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Capeco-4to-seminario-trigo-1.pdf [Accessed March 26, 2018].

Martínez-Crus, E. et al., 2010. Diferencias reológicas de la masa de trigo en líneas recombinantes. II. Relación con combinaciones de los Loci Glu–1 y Glu–3. Agrociencia, 44(6), pp.631–641. Available at: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-31952010000600003 [Accessed March 26, 2018]

Osborne, T., 1924. Vegetable proteins Second EdiOsborne, T., 1924. Vegetable proteins Second Edi

Pérez Lumus, A.P. & García Reina, R.D., 2013. Evaluacion Del Comportamiento Reologico De Dos Muestras. Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia, Escuela de Ciencias Básicas Tecnología e Ingeniería Duitma. Available at: http://repository.unad.edu.co/bitstream/10596/1532/1/Evaluación_del_comportamiento_reológico_de_dos_muestras_de_harina_de_trigo_%28triticum_aestivum_l%29_acondicionada_con_mezcla_de_ﬁbras_comerciales.pdf [Accessed March 26, 2018]

Zhou, P. et al., 2014. Stability of whey protein hydrolysate powders: Eﬀects of relative humidity and temperature. Food Chemistry, 150, pp.457–462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.027