Floristic diversity and structure of the cloud forest of the Río Numbala, Zamora-Chinchipe, Ecuador: The “giant forest” of Podocarpaceae adjacent to the Podocarpus National Park

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59410/RACYT-v01n03ep05-0019

Keywords:

Podocarpaceae, Retrophyllum rospigliosii, Prumnopitys harmsiana, romerillo, permanent plot, cloud forest, Andean fores

Abstract

A forest inventory in a one-hectare permanent plot was conducted in the Numbala Reserve, a protected area of 1013 hectares, located in Palanda canton, Zamora- Chinchipe province, Ecuador, bordering the Podocarpus National Park, at 2100 m, 4°24’19”S, 79°03’36”W. The site is owned and administered by Nature and Culture International, a non-governmental conservation organization. All trees with DBH (diameter at breast height) ! 5 cm were inventoried in the plot. A total of 1091 trees and 171 species were recorded, with a basal area of 47.73 m"/ha and a total timber volume of 652 m3/ha. The dominant species of the forest by their diameters and heights are gymnosperms, two species of Podocarpaceae: Retrophyllum rospigliosii and Prumnopitys harmsiana, which together constitute 59.7% of the basal area and 79.6% of the total wood volume inventoried in the plot. A total of 35 trees of these two species have diameters greater than 70 cm and up to 47 m in height in the plot. Despite the dominance of the two species of gymnosperms, the floristic diversity is relatively high with 171 species of trees recorded in the plot, including numerous species of Rubiaceae, Lauraceae, Meliaceae, Myrtaceae and Melastomataceae. The values of basal area and timber volume, and the number of large trees greater than 70 cm DBH, are very high compared to other neotropical forests. There is bibliographic evidence from past decades of large stands dominated by Podocarpaceae, particularly Retrophyllum rospigliosii, in other Andean countries, but almost all have been cleared for timber extraction, and the Numbala forest is one of the last remnants of these "giant forests" of Podocarpaceae in the tropical Andes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguirre, Z. y N. Aguirre. 1999. Guía práctica para realizar estudios de comunidades vegetales. Herbario Loja Nº 5. Departamento de Botánica y Ecología de la Universidad Nacional de Loja. Loja, Ecuador. 30p.

Atlas de los Andes del Norte y Centro. 2009. Secretaría General de la Comunidad Andina. Editorial Depósito Legal en la Biblioteca Nacional del Perú Nº 2009-03566.

Báez, S., J. Santiana & J. Guevara. 2012. Bosque siempreverde montano bajo del sur de la cordillera de los Andes. Pp. 41-43 En Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador. Sistema de clasificación de los ecosistemas del Ecuador continental. Subsecretaría de Patrimonio Ambiental, Quito.

Cerón C.E. 1993. Manual de Botánica, Sistemática, Etnobotánica y Métodos de Estudio en el Ecuador. Herbario “Alfredo Paredes” QAP, Escuela de Biología de la Universidad Central del Ecuador. Quito, EC. 315 p.

Christopher, J., S. Prudense, N. Foster & S Schneider. 1999. Simulating the effects of climate change on tropical montane cloud forests. Nature 398: 306-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/19293

Colinvaux, P. A., P. E. de Oliveira J. E. Moreno, M. C. Miller, & M. B. Bush. 1996. A long pollen record from lowland Amazonia: forest and cooling in glacial times Science 274: 85-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5284.85

Colinvaux, P. A., P. E. de Oliveira & M. B. Bush. 2000. Amazonian and neotropical plant communities on glacial time-scales: the future of the aridity and refuge hypothesis. Quaternary Science Reviews 19: 141-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00059-1

Collinson, P.E. 1988. An Introduction to World Vegetation, 2nd Edition. Springer, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3935-7

Dalling, J.W., P. Barkan, P.J. Bellingham,

J.R. Healey & E.V.J. Tanner. 2011. Ecology and distribution of Neotropical Podocarpaceae. Pp.43- 56 En B.L. Turner & L.A. Cemusak (eds). Ecology of the Podocarpaceae in Tropical Forests. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 95: 1-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.0081024X.95.43

Enright, N.J. & R.S. Hill. (editores). 1995. Ecology of the Southern Conifers. Melbourne University Press, Australia.

Gálvez J., Z. Aguirre, O. Sánchez, y N. López. 2003. Estado actual de conservación y posibilidades del manejo del romerillo en la región Sur-Occidental del Parque Nacional Podocarpus. Ministerio del Ambiente, Herbario Loja, Programa Podocarpus, Loja, Ecuador. 155 Pp.

Gentry, A. H. 1982a. Patterns of neotropical plant species diversity. Evolutionary Biology 15: 1-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6968-8_1

Gentry, A. H. 1982b. Neotropical floristic diversity: phyto-geographical connections between Central and South America, Pleistocene climatic fluctuations, or an accident of the Andean orogeny? Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 69: 557-593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2399084

Gentry, A. H. 1995. Patterns of diversity and floristic composition in Neotropical montane forest. The New York Botanical Garden. Pp. 103-126 En S. P. Churchill, H. Balslev, E. Forero & J. L. Luteyn (editors). Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Forest. new York Botánical Garden, New York.

Lamprecht, H. 1990. Silvicultura en los trópicos. Trad. Antonio Carrillo. República Federal Alemana. (GTZ) GmbH.

León-Yánez, S., R. Valencia, N. Pitman, L. Endara, C. Ulloa Ulloa y H. Navarrete. (editores). 2011. Libro Rojo de Plantas Endémicas del Ecuador, 2da edición. Herbario QCA, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito. 953 Pp.

Lozano Sivisaca, D.C. y Yaguana Puglla, C.A. 2009. Composición florística, estructura y endemismo del bosque nublado de las reservas naturales: Tapichalaca y Numbala, cantón Palanda, Zamora-Chinchipe. Tesis de grado, Carrera de Ingeniería Forestal, Universdiad Nacional de Loja, Loja, Ecuador. 202 Pp.

Malhi, Y., D. Wood, T.R. Baker et al. [26 autores, incl. D.A. Neill]. 2006. The regional variation of aboveground live biomass in old-growth Amazonian forests. Global Change Biology 12: 1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01120.x

Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador. 2012. Sistema de clasificación de los ecosistemas del Ecuador continental. Subsecretaría de Patrimonio Ambiental, Quito. 136 Pp.

Pennington, T.D., C. Reynel & A. Daza. 2004. Illustrated Guide to the Trees of Peru. DH Books, Sherborne, U.K.

Phillips, O. L., P. Hall, A. H. Gentry, S. A. Sawyer & R. Vásquez. 1994. Dynamics and species richness of tropical rain forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91: 2805-2809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.7.2805

Pilger, R.K.F. 1923. Podocarpus rosìgliosii. Notizblatt des Botanischen Gartens und Museums zu Berlin-Dahlem 8(74): 273–274.

Sánchez, O. y C. Rosales. 2002. Dinámica poblacional en el bosque nublado del Parque Nacional Podocarpus, sector Cajanuma. Tesis Ing. For. Universidad Nacional de Loja. Área Agropecuaria y de Recursos Naturales Renovables. Loja.

Sillett, S.C. & R. Van Pelt. 2007. Trunk reiteration promotes epiphytes and water storage in an old-growth Redwood forest canopy. Ecological Monographs 77(3): 335-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0994.1

Torres-Romero, J.H. 1988. Podocarpaceae. Flora de Colombia, Vol. 5. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá.

Valencia R., H. Balslev & G. Paz y Miño. 1994. High tree alpha-diversity in Amazonian Ecuador. Biodiversity and conservation 3: 21-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115330

Young, K.R. 2006. Bosques húmedos, En R. Morales. et al., (eds). Botánica Económica de los Andes Centrales. Universidad Mayor de San Andrés. La Paz, Bolivia.

Zenteno-Ruíz, F.S. 2007. Retrophyllum rospigliosii (Podocarpaceae), un nuevo registro de Pino de Monte, en el noroeste de Bolivia. Kempffiana 3(2):3-5.

Published

2012-12-28

How to Cite

Yaguana, C., Lozano Sivisaca, D. C., Neill, D. A., & Asanza Novillo, G. M. (2012). Floristic diversity and structure of the cloud forest of the Río Numbala, Zamora-Chinchipe, Ecuador: The “giant forest” of Podocarpaceae adjacent to the Podocarpus National Park. Revista Amazónica. Ciencia Y Tecnología, 1(3), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.59410/RACYT-v01n03ep05-0019

Most read articles by the same author(s)